Legal Opinion

In re Freudman

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided June 1, 1954PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DIMOCK, District Judge.

The bankrupt petitions for review of the referee’s order denying his discharge and for review of the referee’s order denying his motion for a new trial of the issue of his discharge. He urges that the referee erred as a matter of law in denying the discharge so that the discharge should be granted by this court and that, at the least, a new trial be granted.

The discharge was denied on the ground that the bankrupt has “obtained money * * * on credit * * * by making * * * a materially false statement in writing respecting his financial condition” within the meaning of §…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Peter Cottrell Scott v. Norma SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
  2. In the Matter of Aaron S. Freudman, BankruptCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API