Whan v. Green Star S. S. Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Per curiam
With the appellants’ general assertion that the principle of comity requires a federal court, whose receiver has possession of documents, to facilitate in every proper manner the production of evidence required for litigation pending in a state court, we are in thorough accord. See Dier v. Banton, 262 U. S. 147, 151, 43 S. Ct. 533, 67 L. Ed. 915. The existence of a federal receivership should not be allowed to hamper litigants in a state court from securing their evidence, provided production or examination of the receiver’s hooks and papers can be had without interference with due…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Dier v. BantonSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- American Security & Trust Co. v. BrooksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
- Norwood v. Memphis & Charleston RailroadSupreme Court of Alabama · 1882
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. MonjarCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1946
- Finance Co. of America v. BrockCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1936
- In re MoodyDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1934