Legal Opinion

Whan v. Green Star S. S. Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided February 3, 1930No. 146PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

With the appellants’ general assertion that the principle of comity requires a federal court, whose receiver has possession of documents, to facilitate in every proper manner the production of evidence required for litigation pending in a state court, we are in thorough accord. See Dier v. Banton, 262 U. S. 147, 151, 43 S. Ct. 533, 67 L. Ed. 915. The existence of a federal receivership should not be allowed to hamper litigants in a state court from securing their evidence, provided production or examination of the receiver’s hooks and papers can be had without interference with due…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dier v. BantonSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. American Security & Trust Co. v. BrooksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
  3. Norwood v. Memphis & Charleston RailroadSupreme Court of Alabama · 1882

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. MonjarCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1946
  2. Finance Co. of America v. BrockCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1936
  3. In re MoodyDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API