Western Cottonoil Company v. Arnold

GRISSOM, Chief. Justice.

Charles F. Arnold an'd wife sited Western Cottonoil Company for damages alleged'to have been suffered by reason of odors entering their home from soap' stock' stofed by said company in an earthen pit. The jury found that such storing constituted a nuisance and that the Arnolds were damaged $900. Judgment was rendered on the verdict and said Company has appealed. ,

Appellant’s first point asserts error in the introduction of a sample from the soap pit. We do not think reversible error is shown relative to that point and it is overruled.

Appellant’s second point is that…