Legal Opinion
KENNEDY v. HOEGH AUTOLINERS SHIPPING PTE, LTD.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided June 12, 2020No. 2:18-cv-08599Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY NOT FOR PUBLICATION BARBARA KELLY f/k/a BARBARA Civil Action No. KENNEDY, and ALFATAH KENNEDY, OPINION & ORDER Plaintiffs, 2:18cv8599 ES-SCM v. [D.E. 41] HOEGH AUTOLINERS SHIPPING PTE, LTD., HOEGH AUTOLINERS, INC., HOEGH AUTOLINERS SHIPPING AS, and/or HOEGH AUTOLINERS MANAGEMENT AS, as owner of the vessel Hoegh Masan voy. 66, Defendants. STEVEN C. MANNION, United States Magistrate Judge. Before this Court is defendant Hoegh Autoliners Shipping PTE, LTD’s (“Hoegh PTE”) motion to dismiss for insufficient process, insufficient service…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- David Petrucelli Tracy A. Petrucelli, Husband and Wife v. Bohringer and Ratzinger, Gmbh Ausdereitungsanlagen Jake Diel Construction MacHine Inc. Teco Electric and MacHine Company, Ltd. v. Excel Recycling & Manufacturing, Inc., Third-Party David Petrucelli and Tracy A. PetrucelliCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.