Legal Opinion

United States v. Douglas Paul Aman

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 1, 1980No. C.A. 80-1045PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MERRILL, Circuit Judge:

Appellant Douglas Aman was convicted of importation of a controlled substance and possession of a controlled substance with intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 952(a) and 841(a)(1). He appeals, challenging the admission at trial of approximately 42 grams of heroin which he had secreted in his rectal cavity. The presence of foreign objects in Aman’s body cavity was first disclosed by an X-ray search; Aman contends that neither the X-ray search nor the strip search which preceded it was proper.

We disagree. The following facts justified both the strip search…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. McNabb v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Mallory v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Barbara Jean Henderson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
  4. Moises Rivas v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
  5. United States v. Kenneth Malcolm CameronCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Fuller v. M.G. JewelryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  2. United States v. Hsi Huei TsaiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  3. United States v. Lucille Ann Des JardinsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  4. United States v. Martins GeorgeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  5. Clifford George v. Thomas EdholmCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API