Legal Opinion

Vaught v. Vaught

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided February 29, 1944PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Cammack

Dismissing appeal.

Paris Vaught is attempting to appeal from an order setting aside a commissioners’ report recommending a partition of a tract of land between him and his two sisters whom he made parties defendant in this action.

Since we have reached the conclusion the order was merely interlocutory and not final, the appeal must be dismissed, because, as pointed out in Viall v. Coulton, 288 Ky. 690, 157 S. W. (2d) 302, this Court, has jurisdiction only of appeals from final orders; and, therefore, an appeal from an interlocutory order will be dismissed,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Warfield Natural Gas Co. v. CassadyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1936
  2. Viall v. CoultonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1941
  3. Trapp v. ShullSupreme Court of Missouri · 1919

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Buckley v. WilsonKentucky Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Hubbard v. HubbardCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1946
  3. Clement v. FergusonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955
  4. Wright v. Ecolab, Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API