People v. Rosales
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
The issue we are confronted with in this case is whether a defendant is entitled to reversal of his conviction when the prosecutor takes advantage of a bench trial and injects several errors into the proceeding that he admittedly would not have injected into a jury trial, and the judge is silent as to those errors. We hold that although error is less likely to be harmful at a bench trial, the prosecutor’s duty to promote justice and avoid error is nonetheless as imperative as it is in a jury trial.
Following a bench trial in Monroe Circuit Court, defendant, Ruben Rosales, was convicted of four…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Hebert v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- People v. AtkinsMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
- People v. ErbMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973
- People v. IgnofoMichigan Supreme Court · 1946
- People v. HallawayMichigan Supreme Court · 1973
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- People v. BahodaMichigan Supreme Court · 1995
- People v. McElhaneyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1996
- People v. JollyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1992
- People v. BaileyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989
- People of Michigan v. Brandon RobinsonMichigan Court of Appeals · 2019
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.