Legal Opinion

People v. Rosales

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided May 18, 1987No. Docket 87845PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Per curiam

The issue we are confronted with in this case is whether a defendant is entitled to reversal of his conviction when the prosecutor takes advantage of a bench trial and injects several errors into the proceeding that he admittedly would not have injected into a jury trial, and the judge is silent as to those errors. We hold that although error is less likely to be harmful at a bench trial, the prosecutor’s duty to promote justice and avoid error is nonetheless as imperative as it is in a jury trial.

Following a bench trial in Monroe Circuit Court, defendant, Ruben Rosales, was convicted of four…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Hebert v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. People v. AtkinsMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
  3. People v. ErbMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973
  4. People v. IgnofoMichigan Supreme Court · 1946
  5. People v. HallawayMichigan Supreme Court · 1973

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. People v. BahodaMichigan Supreme Court · 1995
  2. People v. McElhaneyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. People v. JollyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. People v. BaileyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. People of Michigan v. Brandon RobinsonMichigan Court of Appeals · 2019

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API