Legal Opinion

Chao v. Occupational Safety & Health Review Commission

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided February 22, 2007No. 05-61087, 05-61089PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judge:

This case asks us to address the scope of the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission’s (“the Commission”) authority to group, for penalty assessment, violations which were charged and proven on a per-instance basis. The statutory framework grants the Commission the authority to assess penalties, but the framework also requires that the Commission assess a penalty between $5,000 and $70,000 for each willful violation. See 29 U.S.C. § 666(a) and (j). In this case, the administrative law judge (“ALJ”) found numerous willful violations, but grouped the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Heckler v. ChaneySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Cuyahoga Valley Railway Co. v. United Transportation UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. W.G. Yates & Sons Construction Co. v. SafetyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006
  4. Kaspar Wire Works, Inc. v. Secretary of LaborCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2001
  5. Chao v. Occupational Safety & Health Review CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sanderson Farms, Incorporated v. OSHCCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2016
  2. State of Texas v. BidenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API