Legal Opinion

Oligschlager v. Territory of Oklahoma

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 11, 1905PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error from the District Court of Garfield County; before James K, Beauchamp, Trial Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the court by

Pancoast, J.:

This was an action commenced by indictment in tbe district court of Garfield county, for a violation of sections five and seven of article 3, of chapter 12. of the Session Laws of 1903, which sections read, as follows:

“Section 5. Every person who keeps a bawdy house, house of ill fame, of assignation, or of prostitution, or any other house or place for persons to visit for unlawful sexual intercourse, or for any other lewd, obscene or indecent pur pose, is guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction shall be fined in any sum not less than $100.00 nor more…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Territory v. PrattSupreme Court Of The Territory Of Dakota · 1889
  2. Roller v. Sutter St. R.R.California Supreme Court · 1884
  3. In re DenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. WilliamsMontana Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Oligschlager v. Territory of OklahomaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API