Legal Opinion

Pratt v. MFA, Inc.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 1, 2002No. 24146PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JAMES K. PREWITT, Judge.

MFA, Inc. (“MFA”) appeals from a decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (“Commission”) which upheld the determination of an administrative law judge in the Division of Workers’ Compensation that Bill Pratt (“Pratt”) suffered a change in condition meriting additional compensation. Pratt contends that his one-hundred-pound weight gain, hypertension, and edema resulted from an injury he sustained while working for MFA, for which he has already received compensation. MFA challenges the Commission’s decision, arguing that Pratt is not entitled to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Blissenbach v. General Motors Assembly DivisionMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Modlin v. Sun Mark, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. Loven v. Greene CountyMissouri Court of Appeals · 2001
  4. Sherman v. First Financial Planners, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2001
  5. Farmer-Cummings v. Future Foam, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2001

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hampton v. Big Boy Steel ErectionSupreme Court of Missouri · 2003
  2. Clark v. FAG Bearings Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. Gilmore-Vann v. AT & T Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API