Legal Opinion

People ex rel. Crowe v. Ludwig

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided July 7, 1930No. Gen. No. 34,285PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice O’Connor

The only defendant named in the bill of complaint as amended was Emma Ludwig, alias Vic Shaw. After the master took the evidence and made up his report recommending a decree as prayed for in the bill, a decree was entered overruling exceptions to the master’s report and enjoining the defendant from maintaining or permitting the use of the premises known as 2904 Prairie Avenue, Chicago, for the purpose of lewdness, assignation or prostitution, and she was perpetually enjoined from using or permitting the use of the building for such purposes, the premises were ordered closed for one year and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Stone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. Murphy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. State v. ToombsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1890
  4. People Ex Rel. Bradford v. ArcegaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  5. State v. RoachSupreme Court of Kansas · 1910

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ciampa v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1973
  2. People ex rel. Difanis v. FutiaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API