Legal Opinion

Beck v. Priddy

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 14, 1923No. 6677. [fn*]PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBlair, J.

This is an appeal from an order granting an injunction upon an ex parte hearing without notice or evidence, save the sworn application for the writ. Appellant filed no answer, but appealed upon notice, as provided by law for appeals from interlocutory orders granting injunctions, and therefore the only question presented for our determination is the sufficiency of this application for the writ. The sworn application being the only testimony in the case, and its sufficiency being attacked, we will set the same out in full, except the description of the land in question by metes and bounds,…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Fielder v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
  2. Beck v. PriddyTexas Commission of Appeals · 1923
  3. Harder v. SandersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API