Legal Opinion

Phipps v. Markin Sanders

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided January 18, 1919Published

Appeal from Pemiscot Circuit Court. — Hon. Sterling H. McCarty, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtFarrington, J.

This is an action in replevin, instituted by the plaintiff to recover from defendants an automobile. The petition and affidavit are in the usual form, the plaintiff claiming title and possession to the car and asking judgment.

The answer of the defendants admits they were in the possession of the ear, and states that its value is $400, and denies each and every allegation in the petition and affidavit, praying for judgment. Further answering, they aver that the plaintiff at the time of the filing -of the petition was not entitled to the possession of the automobile, and that she had no…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Crumpley v. Hannibal & St. Joseph RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1892
  2. Cole v. ColeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1910
  3. Kent v. MiltenbergerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1883
  4. Scharff v. McGaughSupreme Court of Missouri · 1907
  5. Dixon v. McDonnellMissouri Court of Appeals · 1902

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API