Legal Opinion

Araiza v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided February 18, 1925No. 9263PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

The offense is burglary; punishment fixed at confinement in the penitentiary for a period of two years.

The record is before us without statement of facts or bills of exception. The indictment appears regular. No fundamental error has been discovered or pointed out.

The judgment is affirmed., Affirmed.

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ex Parte SlatonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
  2. Walthall v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
  3. Hardin v. EstelleDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 1973
  4. Mayes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1987
  5. Penn v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1982