Kansas Farmers' Fire Insurance v. Saindon
Supreme Court of Kansas
Motion for Rehearing. The facts appear in Insurance Co. v. Saindon, 52 Kas. 486, et seq., and in the opinion herein, filed June 9, 1894.
1Per curiam
Upon the application for a rehearing in this case, it is insisted that this court incorrectly stated in its opinion that “the insurance company issued the policy, and paid Pelletier 25 per cent, for his services.” And again: “That having accepted Pelletier’s services as solicitor, and having paid him for the same, the company cannot now disown his agency.” It appears from the policy of insurance that the premium was $37.50. John E. Bonebrake, the *624president of the insurance company, testified on the trial as follows:
“Ques. What amount of net premium was received by the Kansas Farmers’ Fire…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- German Ins. v. FairbankNebraska Supreme Court · 1891
- Continental Insurance v. WardSupreme Court of Kansas · 1893
3Cited by13 opinions
- Southern Fire Insurance v. KnightSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
- Goorberg v. the Western Assurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
- Sullivan v. Mercantile Town Mut. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Hartford Fire Insurance v. Liddell Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1908
- Republic County Mutual Fire Insurance v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.