Legal Opinion

Cunningham v. Marable

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 28, 1947No. 1092PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By HUNSICKER, J.

This cause comes into this court as an appeal on questions of law. Appellant claims that the trial court committed prejudicial error in directing a verdict against him at the conclusion of the testimony in his behalf.

On the night of December 2, 1942, appellant rented from appellee tourist apartment 27, one of three apartment units in one building. Each unit was equipped with a garage, living room and bedroom. Each garage had overhead doors but no other opening. Each of the other rooms had a window. A door from each garage went into its respective apartment, but the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Munsey v. WebbSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  3. Boronkay v. Robinson & CarpenterNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  4. Patrick v. . SpringsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Holdshoe v. WhineryOhio Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Lewis v. BendinelliScioto County Court of Common Pleas · 1970
  3. Taylor v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API