Stinson v. Arkla Energy Resources
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BLEIL, Justice.
Terry and Johnnie Stinson appeal the trial court’s judgment on a jury verdict in this condemnation proceeding. The critical *771issue on appeal is whether written reports concerning approximately 200 gas pipeline failures should have been admitted as evidence. We determine that the trial court did not err in its evidentiary rulings and affirm the judgment.
Arkla Energy Resources, a division of Arkla, Inc., instituted condemnation proceedings for an approximately two-acre strip of land running across the Stinsons’ land for the purpose of a pipeline. During trial, the Stinsons…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Heddin v. Delhi Gas Pipeline CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1975
- Mundy v. Shippers, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1990
- Delhi Gas Pipeline Company v. MangumCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1974
- Delhi Gas Pipeline Corp. v. GibbsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1982
3Cited by6 opinions
- Crosstex DC Gathering Company, J v. v. Terry Titus Button, Ossie A. Button, T & O Legacy, Ltd., and Southwest Securities, FSB, F/K/A First Savings Bank, FSB, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2013
- Crosstex DC Gathering Company, J v. v. Terry Titus Button, Ossie A. Button, T & O Legacy, Ltd., and Southwest Securities, FSB, F/K/A First Savings Bank, FSB, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2013
- State v. Little Elm Plaza, Ltd., a Texas Limited Partnership and Legacy Bank of Texas AND the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2012
- State v. Little Elm Plaza, Ltd., a Texas Limited Partnership and Legacy Bank of Texas AND the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2012
- Stinson v. Arkla Energy ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.