Legal Opinion

Holy Cross Wilderness Fund v. Madigan

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided April 3, 1992No. 90-1252PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEPHEN H. ANDERSON, Circuit Judge.

The central question in this case is whether the Army Corps of Engineers violated the National Environmental Policy Act (“NEPA”) and section 404 of the Clean Water Act (“CWA”) when it issued a permit to allow construction of the Homestake II water project in the Holy Cross Wilderness Area, located in the White River National Forest outside Denver, Colorado pri- or to the completion of studies designed to develop a plan to mitigate any adverse impact on wetlands in the Wilderness Area. The appellant contends as follows: (1) the Corps violated NEPA when it…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Heckler v. ChaneySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Marsh v. Oregon Natural Resources CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Robertson v. Methow Valley Citizens CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Kleppe v. Sierra ClubSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Ohio Valley Environmental Coalition v. Aracoma Coal Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2009
  2. Utahns for Better Transportation v. United States Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
  3. Sierra Club v. SlaterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
  4. Wyoming v. United States Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
  5. Sierra Club v. SlaterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API