Legal Opinion

City of New York v. Staten Island Rapid Transit Railway Co.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided April 12, 1938PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The question certified is whether the first cause of action of the third amended complaint states facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. This cause of action alleges that prior to the year 1921, defendant, without obtaining the consent of plaintiff, constructed on Wave street in the borough of Bichmond a spur track and siding connecting with its main line and that without right or authority continued until October 19, 1935, to operate this spur track. The law is settled that under such conditions a municipal corporation may not recover for use and occupation of public highways.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. City of New York v. Bee Line, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1936

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. West St. Auto Service, Inc. v. SchmidtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1966
  2. Mercy v. University Gardens Property Owners Ass'nNew York Supreme Court · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API