Legal Opinion

United States v. Farnham

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided January 20, 1904No. 20PublishedCited by 3 opinions

On Motion for New Trial.

1Opinion of the Court

J. B. McPHERSON, District Judge.

The defendant was convicted upon an indictment drawn under the act of April 18, 1884. (23 Stat. 11, c. 26; 1 Supp. Rev. St. 425 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3679]), charging him with the following offense: that he “did, with intent to defraud one Charles Weingartner, feloniously, unlawfully, and falsely assume and pretend to be an officer and employé acting under the authority of the United States, to wit, a secret service operative of the Treasury Department of the United States, and did then and there, in such assumed and pretended character of an officer and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. TaylorDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1900
  2. United States v. CurtainDistrict Court, W.D. South Carolina · 1890

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Littell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1909
  2. United States v. GreweDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1965
  3. United States v. BarnowDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API