Legal Opinion

Hill v. Hartog

Utah Supreme Court

Decided February 9, 1983No. 17933PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OAKS, Justice:

In this lessor’s action for default in the payment of rent on a lease agreement, the district court entered a judgment on a special verdict against defendants for $20,000. Only defendant Roberts appeals, seeking reversal or a new trial because the district court excluded the testimony of his code-fendants as to (1) whether or not the lease instrument was final and binding, and (2) whether appellant was a lessee or merely a guarantor of the lease.

Respondent owned real property in Lay-ton, Utah. He was approached by defendant Dale Hartog and representatives of Tu-nex regarding the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Sine v. HarperUtah Supreme Court · 1950
  2. State v. CooperUtah Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Gray v. GraySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1969
  4. Bradford v. Alvey & SonsUtah Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Taylor v. MazzolaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1962

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Eggert v. Wasatch Energy Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Olympus Hills Shopping Center, Ltd. v. Smith's Food & Drug Centers, Inc.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1994
  3. Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City v. TannerUtah Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Sydenstricker v. MohanWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Redevelopment Agency of Roy v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API