Legal Opinion · Dissent

Webb v. Sowell

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided April 19, 2010No. 26807Published

1DissentChief Justice Toal

I respectfully dissent. Appellant argues that S.C.Code Ann. § 63-3-530(A)(17), as interpreted by Risinger v. Risinger, 273 S.C. 36, 253 S.E.2d 652 (1979), violates the equal protection clauses of the United States and South Carolina constitutions. I disagree.

“In reviewing a statute challenged on equal protection grounds, great deference is given to the classification created, and it will be sustained if supported by any reasonable hypothesis and not plainly arbitrary.” Mitchell v. Owens, 304 S.C. 23, 24-25, 402 S.E.2d 888, 889 (1991), citing Samson v. Greenville Hosp. Sys., 295 S.C. 359, 368…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ward v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  2. Risinger v. RisingerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1979
  3. Samson v. Greenville Hospital SystemSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1988
  4. Riggs v. RiggsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2003
  5. Mitchell v. OwensSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API