Legal Opinion

Lion Fire Insurance Co. of London v. Wicker

Texas Supreme Court

Decided March 5, 1900No. 874PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to the Court of Civil Appeals for the Second. District, in an appeal from Clay County.

1Opinion of the Court

BROWN, Associate Justice.

Plaintiff in error challenges the fourteenth conclusion of fact filed by the trial court, to the effect that at. the time the policy was issued and when the loss occurred Hamner was the unconditional owner of the granary building. We can not say as a matter of law that Hamner did not own the building because he did not have title to the land. The circumstances were such that the judge might have inferred consent of the owner of the land for Hamner to place the building there for use during his occupancy of the land and to remove it when he should surrender possession.…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Interstate Fire Ins. Co. v. SorrellsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  2. Vaughn v. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1904
  3. Pennsylvania Fire Insurance v. WaggenerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API