Legal Opinion

Bryan R. Katz and Kristine J. Concepcion v. Great American Abstract, LLC

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided July 28, 2026No. 2:23-cv-01188Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA BRYAN R. KATZ and KRISTINE J. CONCEPCION, Plaintiffs, CIVIL ACTION NO. 23-1188 v. GREAT AMERICAN ABSTRACT, LLC, et. al., Defendants. Pappert, J. July 28, 2026 MEMORANDUM After finding Daniel A. Berger unreasonably and vexatiously multiplied the proceedings, the Court granted Great American’s motion for sanctions under

28 U.S.C. § 1927

and ordered Berger to pay Great American’s reasonable excess costs, expenses and attorneys’ fees associated with fifteen specific docket entries. The Court now imposes on Berger…

2Cases cited11 opinions

Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
McKenna v. City of PhiladelphiaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
Student Public Interest Research Group of New Jersey, Inc. And Friends of the Earth, in 86-5927 v. At & T Bell Laboratories, in 86-5895Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
In Re Prudential Insurance Company America Sales Practice Litigation Agent Actions, Michael P. Malakoff, Esquire, and Malakoff, Doyle & Finberg, P.C.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.