Gilbert v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BAKER, Judge.
Today we address some basic principles of fundamental due process, namely, a criminal defendant’s right to confront witnesses against her, its interrelationship with hearsay evidence, and the State’s burden to prove its ease beyond a reasonable doubt. More particularly, the State argues that the introduction of hearsay testimony through a police officer was harmless error, inasmuch as the appellant-defendant, Starlett Gilbert, could have called the declarant, who was also a police officer and present at trial, to challenge the hearsay statements that were erroneously…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Carpenter v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2003
- Payne v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
- Pendergrass v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2009
- Williams v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
3Cited by1 opinion
- Samantha Lee v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2014