Legal Opinion

Gilbert v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided September 26, 2011No. 49A04-1102-CR-77PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BAKER, Judge.

Today we address some basic principles of fundamental due process, namely, a criminal defendant’s right to confront witnesses against her, its interrelationship with hearsay evidence, and the State’s burden to prove its ease beyond a reasonable doubt. More particularly, the State argues that the introduction of hearsay testimony through a police officer was harmless error, inasmuch as the appellant-defendant, Starlett Gilbert, could have called the declarant, who was also a police officer and present at trial, to challenge the hearsay statements that were erroneously…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Carpenter v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Payne v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. Pendergrass v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Williams v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Samantha Lee v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API