CSX Transportation, Inc. v. Owens
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
JONES, Justice.
We agreed.to review the Court of Civil Appeals’ grant of a writ of mandamus directing the Montgomery County Circuit Court to exercise jurisdiction over this case, 533 So.2d 613. We disagree with the Court of Civil Appeals’ reasons for issuing the writ (i.e., its approval of the petitioner CSX’s right to amend its complaint by raising the ad damnum clause from $1,000 to $1,005). Nonetheless, we affirm the grant of the writ because we also disagree with the Court of Civil Appeals’ rejection of CSX’s secondary ground for the writ (that the original complaint claiming $1,000…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Ex Parte SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
- Thomas v. Liberty Nat. Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1979
- Harper v. Regency Development Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1981
- Ex Parte CSX Transp., Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1987
3Cited by18 opinions
- Henderson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1993
- Dennis v. JonesCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1995
- Eufaula Marine Power & Equipment, LLC v. Safety-Kleen Systems, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2013
- In re: Armstrong Methodist Church v. Alabama-West Florida Conference of the United Methodist Church, Inc., and the Board of Trustees of the Alabama-West Florida Conference of the United Methodist Church, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2026
- In re: Baggett Chapel United Methodist Church v. Alabama-West Florida Conference of the United Methodist Church, Inc., and the Board of Trustees of the Alabama-West Florida Conference of the United Methodist Church, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2026
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.