Legal Opinion

Howell v. Howell

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided October 15, 1862PublishedCited by 2 opinions

The facts of this case are fully stated by the Chancellor in his opinion. The cause was argued ex parte by

1Opinion of the Court

The Chancellor.

The complainants, by their bill, seek relief against the operation of a deed of bargain and sale, bearing date on the twentieth of March, 1858, made to their father, Lewis Howell, by Dennis Cochran, for a farm in the township of Newton. The bill charges that the farm was purchased by the complainants for their own use, and that so much of the consideration as has been paid was paid by them; that being unable to raise the balance of the purchase money by mortgage upon the premises, in consequence of a pre-existing encumbrance, their father consented to aid them by raising money…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Vreeland v. DawsonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959
  2. McAllister v. McAllister Coal Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API