Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Gallivan v. Walker

Utah Supreme Court

Decided July 26, 2002No. 20020545Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

THORNE, Court of Appeals Judge,

concurring in part and dissenting in part.

T8 I concur with the court's decision holding that Utah Code Ann. § 20A-7-207(4) (1998) does not confer jurisdiction upon this court to consider a constitutional challenge to the statute.

T 9 I respectfully dissent from today's decision to assert jurisdiction over this action, and thereby examine petitioners' underlying substantive claim, pursuant to this court's extraordinary writ authority.

1 10 In the instant case petitioners do not argue that the Hieutenant governor improperly counted the number of signatures, nor do…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Grendell v. DavidsonOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Beamon v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
  3. Renn v. Utah State Board of PardonsUtah Supreme Court · 1995
  4. People Ex Rel. Scott v. KernerIllinois Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Nelson v. MillerUtah Supreme Court · 1971

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API