Legal Opinion

Excelsior Steel Furnace Co. v. Williamson Heater Co.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided January 9, 1923No. 3719PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

In our opinion the decree of the district court is clearly right. It is not denied that the art prior to Scherer showed, not only every element of the claim in suit, but all the elements except the last (the notches) in combination. It is not of substantial importance that the Smith prior patent disclosure and the Wheeling prior use of the notch feature were applied to round pipe, rather than, as by Scherer, to rectangular pipe; nor that, in one form of the Wheeling *133structure, in bending the tongues through the notches, the room for manipulation was restricted. The uses were in the same art,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Railroad Supply Co. v. Elyria Iron & Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Adams v. Galion Iron Works & Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1930
  2. Ranco, Inc. v. GwynnCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1942
  3. Bettendorf Co. v. Ohio Steel Foundry Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1932
  4. Westinghouse Air Brake Co. v. Schwarze Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1939
  5. Stockham Pipe & Fittings Co. v. Ohio Steel Foundry Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1935

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API