Gore v. State
Supreme Court of Arkansas
APPEAL from Montgomery Circuit Court. L. Leatherman, Special Judge. Appellant, having absconded, the court properly proceeded with the trial to verdict. Sec. 2213 Mansf. Dig.
1Opinion of the CourtSandels, J.
Appellant, E. N. Gore, was'indicted in Montgomery Circuit Court for grand larceny and gave bail for his-appearance. He was present at the commencement of the trial, on the 17th day of February, 1880. On the next day, and during the progress of the trial he absented himself. Thereupon, the Prosecuting Attorney having elected to proceed, the court allowed the cause to progress to a verdict. The jury found appellant guilty. Subsequently, on the 21st: day of August, 1889, appellant was brought into court in custody of the Sheriff, and judgment was rendered upon the verdict.
The motion for a new…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Reynolds v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Price v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1872
- Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1856
3Cited by16 opinions
- Falk v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1899
- Bennett v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1896
- Davidson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1913
- State Ex Rel. Shetsky v. UtechtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
- Darden v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1904
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.