Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Upshaw v. Maxfield

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided February 28, 2022No. 1:22-cv-01492Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK KEVIN UPSHAW, in the capacity of Trustee for and on behalf of the Wilson Freight Company Trust, Plaintiff, ORDER v. 22 Civ. 1492 (ER) SHERYL MAXFIELD, Director of the Ohio Department of Commerce Division of Unclaimed Funds, Defendant. RAMOS, D.J. Plaintiff Kevin Upshaw brings this pro se action, for which the filing fee has been paid, seeking to recover assets totaling $330,157.51 that he claims escheated wrongfully to the State of Ohio. Doc. 1. The Court dismisses the complaint for the reasons set forth below. I. STANDARD OF REVIEW…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Coppedge v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Ben Gary Triestman v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
  3. Harris v. MillsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
  4. Salahuddin v. CuomoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
  5. Fitzgerald v. First East Seventh Street Tenants Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API