Legal Opinion

Deffenbaugh-Williams v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided September 2, 1999No. 97-10685PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

RHESA HAWKINS BARKSDALE, Circuit Judge:

Our en banc court, 182 F.3d 833, 1999 WL 528486, having reinstated our prior opinion, 156 F.3d 581 (1998), except for part II. C. (punitive damages), id. at 592-98, at issue on remand is whether the recently-clarified standard for such Title VII damages, Kolstad v. American Dental Association, — U.S. -, 119 S.Ct. 2118, — L.Ed.2d - (1999), requires a new trial on that issue or supports the district court’s judgment as a matter of law for Wal-Mart. We REVERSE and REMAND for reinstatement of the punitive damages award for Julie Deffenbaugh-Williams…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Faragher v. City of Boca RatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  2. Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. VinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Burlington Industries, Inc. v. EllerthSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. The Boeing Company v. Daniel C. ShipmanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  5. Smith v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Spring v. Beverly Ent MsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API