Deffenbaugh-Williams v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
RHESA HAWKINS BARKSDALE, Circuit Judge:
Our en banc court, 182 F.3d 833, 1999 WL 528486, having reinstated our prior opinion, 156 F.3d 581 (1998), except for part II. C. (punitive damages), id. at 592-98, at issue on remand is whether the recently-clarified standard for such Title VII damages, Kolstad v. American Dental Association, — U.S. -, 119 S.Ct. 2118, — L.Ed.2d - (1999), requires a new trial on that issue or supports the district court’s judgment as a matter of law for Wal-Mart. We REVERSE and REMAND for reinstatement of the punitive damages award for Julie Deffenbaugh-Williams…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Faragher v. City of Boca RatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. VinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Burlington Industries, Inc. v. EllerthSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- The Boeing Company v. Daniel C. ShipmanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- Smith v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Spring v. Beverly Ent MsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000