Legal Opinion

Mettall v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided April 27, 1921No. 6134PublishedCited by 3 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

Appellant was convicted of forgery. The instrument declared on was a check on the First National Bank of Fort Worth for $22, naming Frank J. Begonia, or bearer, as payee, and purporting to bear the signature of J. W. Dodd. When introduced in evidence, there was written on the back of the check “Frank J. Begonia” and also, in pencil, “Douglas Maddox.”

The State, by circumstances, sought to show that the signature was forged, and in pursuance of this effort introduced several witnesses who were residents of Fort Worth, where the check was purported to have been drawn and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Fry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1918
  2. Gallegos v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1905
  3. Sullivan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1899
  4. Bloch v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1916
  5. Gumpert v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gandy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1925
  2. Hepworth v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1938
  3. Reynolds v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API