Legal Opinion
Richardson v. Buehre
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided July 5, 1957No. Civ. No. 1854Published
1Opinion of the Court
DONOVAN, District Judge.
Plaintiff had a verdict in the instant ■case. Defendant has moved to vacate the judgment entered thereon, or in the alternative for a new trial.
Defendant’s motions are predicated upon the following grounds: 1. The verdict is contrary to the evidence. 2. The verdict is contrary to law. 3. The trial court erred: (a) in instructing the jury with respect to the presumption of due care in favor of plaintiff’s decedent; and (b) in the reception of expert testimony.
The contentions of defendant will be discussed in the order above set forth.
1. Is the verdict supported by the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ellis v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Waylander-Peterson Co. v. Great Northern Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1953
- Shell Oil Co. v. KaplerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
- TePoel v. LarsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
- Railway Express Agency, Inc. v. MacKayCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1950
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.