Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Rogers v. Murnane

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 14, 1927No. 26,413PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion

The relator was granted a rehearing that he might present certain claims not advanced at the prior hearing. He claims that the affidavit required by the federal statute to be produced by the executive authority of the demanding state was not made before a magistrate of South Dakota; and that the warrant only states that a demand has been made for the relator as a fugitive from justice, without stating that he is such fugitive, and does not state that he stands charged with a crime either by indictment or affidavit.

3. The statute of the United States, R.S. § 5278, U.S. Comp. St. § 10126,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Arnold v. JustusSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
  2. In re KellerDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1888
  3. State ex rel. Denton v. CurtisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
  4. State ex rel. Grande v. BatesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
  5. In re the Appeal of SandersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State Ex Rel. Rogers v. MurnaneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API