Legal Opinion
Millsap v. Lotz
District Court, W.D. Missouri
Decided December 13, 1950No. 989PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
REEVES, Chief Judge.
Counsel for the defendant has filed an elaborate motion for a more definite statement and has supplemented his motion with an extensive brief or suggestions in, support thereof. The complaint has been examined in the light of the motion for a more definite statement and it appears not only that the complaint complies with Rule 8 of Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. but that the motion for a more definite statement calls for information and not for the clarification of doubtful or ambiguous aver-ments.
Judge Gourley of the District Court, Western District of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Schmidt v. GoingDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1938
- Byers v. OlanderDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1948
3Cited by4 opinions
- Mitchell v. E-Z Way Towers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
- James P. Mitchell, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. E-Z Way Towers, Inc., James P. Mitchell, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. E-Z Way Erectors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
- R. J. Saunders & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971
- R. J. Saunders & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971