Legal Opinion

Sabo v. Stefan

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Northampton County

Decided July 1, 1922No. 83Published

Assumpsit. Rule to strike statement from the record. C. P. Northampton Co., June T., 1921, No. 83.

1Opinion of the CourtStewart, P. J.

This is a rule upon plaintiffs to show cause why the statement of claim should not be stricken from the record. It is provided by the Practice Act of May 14, 1915, P. L. 483, that every pleading shall contain, and contain only, a statement in a concise and summary form of the material facts on which the party pleading relies for his claim. This is the test that we must apply to the plaintiffs’ statement. The first paragraph sets forth a sale by the plaintiffs to the defendant of certain goods and merchandise in the amounts and for the prices set forth in a true and correct copy of the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. In re Estate of FultonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
  2. Churchman v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1841
  3. Hall v. WoodSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1898
  4. Corr v. SellersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1882
  5. Shoemaker v. KellogSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1849

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API