Comstock v. Wilson
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Order affirmed, with costs upon the authority of Cohn v. Ansonia Realty Co. (162 App. Div. 791): All concur, except Crouch and Taylor, JJ., who dissent and vote for reversal on the law and for granting a new trial upon the ground that in their opinion under the charge of the court and the court’s refusal to charge, the law as stated in Mitchell v. Rochester R. R. Co. (151 N. Y. 107) and O’Brien v. Moss (220 App. Div. 464) is controlling. Present — Sears, P. J., Crouch, Taylor, ThompsonYracTCrosby, JJ.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Mitchell v. . Rochester Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1896
- Cohn v. Ansonia Realty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914
- O'Brien v. MossAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927