Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Barbuto v. Ohio Edison Co.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 7, 1968No. 5850PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDoyle, J.

This is an action in quo warranto, commenced originally in this court by the state of Ohio, on the relation of the Prosecuting Attorney of Summit County, in which the state prays that the respondent, the Ohio Edison Company “be compelled to answer to the state authority, by what warrant it claims to use and enjoy the liberties, privileges and franchises” of certain public utility claimed rights, “and that it be ousted from using the same. ’ ’

The petition alleges that the respondent is an Ohio private corporation, operating a public utility, and engaged in the business of generating and…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Simpson v. Van RyzinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1972
  2. Jefferson County v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1976
  3. State ex rel. Barbuto v. Ohio Edison Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1968
  4. State v. TaylorSupreme Court of Alabama · 1982
  5. Simpson v. Van RyzinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1972

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API