Legal Opinion
Estrada-Escobar v. Ashcroft
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided July 20, 2004No. 02-9568PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BALDOCK, Circuit Judge.
After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
Petitioners are natives and citizens of Peru. They have overstayed their visitors’ visas to this country and acknowledge their status as removable aliens. They assert, however, that they fear for their lives if returned to Peru because a terrorist group known as the Sendero Luminoso (“Shining…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Elias-ZacariasSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Gerardo Bibiano Falcon Carriche Theresa v. De Falcon Carriche and Christina Pamela Falcon Bibiano v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Miguel Cruz-Navarro, Graciela Egoavil-Valenzuela, and Sergio Brian Cruz-Egoavil v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- FUENTESBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1988
- Emil Avgoustov Krastev Neli Pecheva Krasteva v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Abdelhadi Hor v. Alberto R. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
- Tulengkey v. AshcroftCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- Vicente-Elias v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- Karki v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
- Apolinar Perafan Saldarriaga Luz Velasquez Carmona Adrianna Menesses Velasquez Mauricio Perafan Velasquez v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2005
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.