Legal Opinion

Killmeyer v. Forged Steel Wheel Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 5, 1914No. Appeal, No. 225PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal, No. 225, Oct. T., 1913, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. Butler Co., Sept. T., 1912, No. 63, on verdict for plaintiff in case of William Killmeyer v. The Forged Steel Wheel Company, a corporation. Trespass to recover damages for personal injuries. Before Prather, P. J., specially presiding. The opinion of the Supreme Court states the facts. Verdict for plaintiff for $2,180, and judgment thereon. Defendant appealed.

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 225, Oct. T., 1913, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. Butler Co., Sept. T., 1912, No. 63, on verdict for plaintiff in case of William Killmeyer v. The Forged Steel Wheel Company, a corporation. Trespass to recover damages for personal injuries. Before Prather, P. J., specially presiding. The opinion of the Supreme Court states the facts. Verdict for plaintiff for $2,180, and judgment thereon. Defendant appealed. Errors assigned were answers to points, the refusal of the court to direct a verdict for defendant and to enter judgment for defendant n. o. v.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr; Justice Elkin,

In refusing the motion for judgment non obstante veredicto the learned judge who presided at the trial in the court below made the following summary of the material facts as they appeared from the testimony: "The uncontroverted evidence in this case showed that the plaintiff was an employee of the defendant company, and, while so employed, fell into an unguarded hole in the floor of the defendant company’s plant. It appeared *112that the floor consisted of removable iron plates, so designed for the purpose of affording access to the large presses of the defendant…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bennett v. Standard Plate Glass Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
  2. Johnson v. BrunerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1869
  3. Gilbert v. Elk Tanning Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
  4. Henessey v. Wabash Mills Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
  5. Smith v. Oil City Tube Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1898

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Garrison v. Armstrong & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
  2. Summerskill v. Vermont Power & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1917
  3. Mayers v. Atlantic Refining Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
  4. O'Donnell v. Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API