Legal Opinion

Heiges v. Baum

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 17, 1919No. Appeal, No. 95PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal, No. 95, October T., 1918, by defendant, from decree of O. P. Clearfield County, September T., 1911, No. 6, in equity in case of J. H. Heiges v. W. C. Baum. Bill in equity for an injunction to restrain the closing of an alley. Before Whitehead, P. J., specially presiding. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Superior Court. The court awarded an injunction. Error assigned, among others, was the decree of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Porter, J.,

This is an appeal by the defendant from the decree of the court below restraining him from fencing or in any manner obstructing an alley upon which the property of the plaintiff abutted. The defendant acquired title to a tract of land containing two acres in the Borough of DuBois, in the year 1881, under the will of his mother; he was at that time a minor and Fred Tracy was his duly appointed guardian. In 1883, Tracy, the guardian, presented his petition setting forth the ownership by his ward of the tract of land in question, that the ward had no personal estate to pay…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Jacoby v. McMahonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Thompson TrustSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API