Commonwealth Ex Rel. Burn v. Burns
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
HOFFMAN, Judge:
Appellant contends that the lower court abused its discretion: (1) by refusing to vacate or reduce an order requiring him to pay $20 per week for the support of his daughter and (2) by dismissing his petition requesting the court to order appellee to contribute to the support of the parties’ two sons. We affirm the lower court’s order dismissing appellant’s petition to vacate or modify the $20 per week support order. However, we reverse the lower court’s order dismissing appellant’s petition that appellee be ordered to contribute to *396the support of the parties’ two sons and…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Conway v. DanaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Costello v. LeNoirSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Lindenfelser v. LindenfelserSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- Hecht v. HechtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- Weiser v. WeiserSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Caswell v. CaswellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Akers v. AkersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Vona v. StickleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Roberts v. BockinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Kinsey v. KinseySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.