Legal Opinion

In re the Estate Flory

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided July 1, 1936Published

1Opinion of the Court

Delehanty, S.

The fund deposited with the city chamberlain was “ subject to the direction of this court.” By prior order a part payment was directed. The order then made contained a provision that it was without prejudice to any proceeding by petitioners to enforce their rights in any court. At the time that order was made the chamberlain had on hand in cash only part of the *817fund which he was directed to hold subject to the order of the court. The chamberlain now urges that the former order was in effect a confirmation of the investment of a balance of the fund and so urges that no further…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Matter of Schmidt v. Chamberlain of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1935
  2. Von Seebeck v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API