New York v. United States
United States Court of Claims
On the claimants Motion. The Reporters’ statement of the case: The following are the facts relating to the claimant’s application as set forth and filed by the court: I. June 8,1891, judgment was rendered in this court in favor of the State of New York for $91,320.84, on a claim filed for $131,188.02. August 8, 1891, an appeal was taken by tbe United States to tbe Supreme Court, and a cross appeal by tbe State of N ew York. II.
Read the full summary
On the claimants Motion. The Reporters’ statement of the case: The following are the facts relating to the claimant’s application as set forth and filed by the court: I. June 8,1891, judgment was rendered in this court in favor of the State of New York for $91,320.84, on a claim filed for $131,188.02. August 8, 1891, an appeal was taken by tbe United States to tbe Supreme Court, and a cross appeal by tbe State of N ew York. II. Tbe cross appeals were argued, and on January 6, 1896, tbe Supreme Court decided tbe same, bolding in its opinion tbat tbe State of New York was entitled to tbe amount…
1Opinion of the Court
RichardsoN, Ch. J.,
delivered the opinion of the court:
This is the first case since the passage of the Act of March 3,1863, chapter 92, section 7 (now Rev. Stat., sec. 1090), allowing interest on judgments of this court in favor of claimants, affirmed by the Supreme Court on appeal, in which application has been made to have interest included in the judgment on the mandate.
It was the invariable practice of the Treasury Department, *280upon a transcript of the record of this court that the mandate of the Supreme Court affirming the judgment appealed from was filed, to estimate for and to pay…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Pacific Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Hobbs v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1884
3Cited by1 opinion
- Mosby v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1897