Legal Opinion

(HC) Fegan v. Schultz

District Court, E.D. California

Decided December 3, 2024No. 1:24-cv-01250Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 STEPHEN FEGAN, Case No. 1:24-cv-01250-KES-SAB-HC 12 Petitioner, ORDER DENYING PETITIONER’S APPLICATION FOR BAIL 13 v. (ECF No. 9) 14 SCHULTZ, et al., 15 Respondents. 16 17 18 Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus 19 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 20 On December 2, 2024, Petitioner filed an application for bail pending determination of 21 his petition for writ of habeas corpus. (ECF No. 9.) The Ninth Circuit has “not yet decided 22 whether district courts have…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. James McCandlessCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  2. United States v. Juan Ruben Estela-MelendezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API