Legal Opinion
Hudak v. Fox
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided February 19, 1987PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
215 N.J. Super. 233 (1987)
521 A.2d 889
JOSEPH HUDAK, LOUIS BECKER AND RUSSELL WALKER, PLAINTIFFS,
v.
WILLIAM F. FOX AND THE TOWNSHIP OF EAST BRUNSWICK, A MUNICIPALITY OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANTS.
WILLIAM FOX, PLAINTIFF,
v.
JOSEPH HUDAK, LOUIS BECKER, RUSSELL WALKER, JACK HENNESSEY AND JOHN FRENCH, DEFENDANTS.
ESTHER NOVAK FOX, PLAINTIFF,
v.
JOSEPH HUDAK, LOUIS BECKER, RUSSELL WALKER, JACK HENNESSEY AND JOHN FRENCH, DEFENDANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued January 21, 1987.
Decided February 19, 1987.
Before Judges ANTELL, BRODY and LONG.
Andre Gruber argued the cause…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- St. Amant v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Time, Inc. v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Time, Inc. v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Herman v. Sunshine Chemical Specialties, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
- Chester v. Indianapolis Newspapers, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1990
- Schwartz v. WORRALL PUBLICATIONSNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1992
- CHANNEL 4, KGBT v. BriggsTexas Supreme Court · 1988
- CHANNEL 4, KGBT v. BriggsTexas Supreme Court · 1988
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.