Legal Opinion

George Hamilton v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided January 15, 1936No. 17843Published

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion

ON STATE’S MOTION FOR REHEARING.

HAWKINS, Judge.

Upon original submission, we were somewhat doubtful whether the evidence showed that the oats sold by appellant the day following the theft corresponded substantially with the quantity of oats stolen. The State’s written argument in support of its motion for rehearing directs our attention to certain parts of the testimony which in large measure clears the question up.

Albert Wagley, the owner of the stolen oats, testified on direct examination that the amount of oats taken were “approximately one hundred bushels * * * I do not know the exact…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ennox v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1936
  2. Faulkner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1926
  3. Hodges v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1927
  4. Springer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API