Legal Opinion · Dissent

Inchaustegui v. 666 5th Avenue Ltd. Partnership

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 13, 2000Published

1DissentSullivan, P. J.

In my view, the majority improperly limits the damages recoverable by the landlord to the amounts paid for insurance premiums and certain “out-of-pocket costs suffered by the landlord and not covered by the procured insurance.” I would modify the order to award the landlord all its damages resulting from the tenant’s failure to procure insurance. Accordingly, I dissent.

The measure of damages for breaching a contractual provision to procure liability insurance naming* the other party to the contract as an additional insured is all damages resulting from the breach, including the amount paid to…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Kinney v. G. W. Lisk Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. Winkelmann v. Excelsior InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. Silinsky v. State-Wide InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968
  4. Drinkwater v. . DinsmoreNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  5. Healy v. RennertNew York Court of Appeals · 1961

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API