Trowbridge v. Bullard
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Van Burén. (Buck, J.) Trover. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.
There is no controversy over the facts in this case. As they appeared upon the trial in the court below, they are substantially as follows:
On September 22, 1888, Messrs. Clark, Baker & Co., who were wholesale grocers at Jackson, in this State, had & claim against one Frank Potts, of Decatur, and to recover and collect it commenced a suit by attachment in the circuit court for Van 'Burén county. The writ of attachment was delivered to James F. Bullard, who was then the under-sheriff of the county of Van Burén. On •September 22, Bullard attached a quantity of property, consisting largely of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Rinchey v. . StrykerNew York Court of Appeals · 1863
- Davis v. BallMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1850
- McKibben v. BartonMichigan Supreme Court · 1849
- Sawyer v. WilsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1873
3Cited by10 opinions
- Gillen v. Wakefield State BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
- Dempsey v. PforzheimerMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
- Fisher v. KellyOregon Supreme Court · 1896
- Lant v. ManleyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1896
- Beckstead v. GriffithIdaho Supreme Court · 1906
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.